The Moment You Notice: Someone feeling down, sitting alone, standing back from everyone else.
There is a strange little moment that happens to us all the time.
We notice something.
Someone’s voice changes.
A friend becomes unusually quiet.
A child stops playing.
Someone smiles, but the smile doesn’t quite reach their eyes.
We notice the hesitation before someone answers a question. The tension in a room. The person standing just a little too far away from everyone else.
Most of these moments seem insignificant.
We notice them, and then we move on.
But sometimes we don’t.
Sometimes something catches our attention and refuses to let go.
And I have begun to wonder if that tiny moment—the moment we notice—may be far more important than we realize.
Because seeing and noticing are not quite the same thing.
We see an enormous amount every day. Our senses are constantly gathering information, much of which never reaches our conscious attention.
Noticing is different.
Noticing is when something crosses the invisible threshold between what is happening and what we become aware is happening.
And once we notice, something else becomes possible.
We can choose what to do with what we have seen.
The Moment You Notice: Seeing Isn’t the Same As Noticing
What happens next?
Imagine that you notice someone is vulnerable.
Perhaps they’re frightened.
Perhaps they’re lonely.
Perhaps they’re desperate for approval.
Perhaps they’re simply having a terrible day.
The vulnerability itself is neither good nor bad. It is simply something you have perceived.
But what happens next can tell us something about the consciousness doing the perceiving.
One person might think:
How can I help?
Another might think:
How can I avoid making this worse?
Another might not know what to do at all—but recognize that something is wrong and remain present.
And another person might see the same vulnerability and immediately begin calculating how it could be used.
The perception is the same.
The orientation is not.
This is something I’ve been thinking about a great deal lately.
We often assume that a person who understands other people well must therefore possess a highly developed consciousness.
But that isn’t necessarily true.
The Moment You Notice: Predators Can Notice Too
A predator has to be observant.
A predator has to recognize weakness.
A predator has to understand behavior well enough to anticipate what another creature will do.
In fact, some of the most destructive people can be extraordinarily perceptive.
They notice everything.
They simply use what they notice differently.
And perhaps that is one of the great misunderstandings about consciousness.
Awareness by itself does not make us wise.
We can become extremely good at seeing without becoming any better at understanding.
We can become extraordinarily skilled at reading other people without ever becoming interested in what our knowledge does to them.
We can learn someone’s fears, desires, insecurities and dreams—and use that knowledge either to protect them or to control them.
The difference isn’t necessarily in the information.
It is in the direction that information takes us.
The Moment You Notice: The Space Between Seeing & Doing Stands Choice
The little space between noticing and doing
There is, however, something remarkable that can happen between perception and action.
A pause.
It might last only a second.
We notice our irritation before we speak.
We notice that someone is afraid before we push harder.
We notice our own desire to win an argument.
We notice the impulse to retaliate.
We notice that we are enjoying someone else’s humiliation.
We notice.
And suddenly we have a choice that we didn’t have a moment before.
We can still make the wrong choice.
We can still be angry. We can still be selfish. We can still misunderstand.
Being conscious does not make us perfect.
But noticing gives us the opportunity to interrupt the automatic response.
Perhaps that is where consciousness becomes something more than perception.
Perhaps consciousness is not simply the ability to see what is happening.
Perhaps it is the ability to see what is happening and remain conscious of what we do next.
The Moment You Notice: Yourself Noticing Within
And sometimes the thing we notice is ourselves
This may be the hardest kind of noticing.
It is relatively easy to recognize someone else’s cruelty.
It is much harder to recognize our own.
We notice the manipulation in someone else, but not the manipulation in ourselves.
We notice another person’s need for control, but overlook our own.
We recognize someone else’s arrogance while quietly protecting our own.
We can become very clever at seeing what we don’t want to see in ourselves.
This is where the inward journey becomes important.
Becoming conscious isn’t simply learning more about the world.
Sometimes it means becoming willing to look at what is happening inside us without immediately defending it, explaining it away, or pretending it isn’t there.
Because the moment we notice something within ourselves, we have a choice too.
We can turn away.
We can become defensive.
We can blame someone else.
Or we can stay with what we have seen long enough to understand it.
That small pause can change everything.
That Is Where Consciousness Begins & Sapience Grows
The moment you notice
Maybe this is why I have become so fascinated by the word sapience.
We tend to associate wisdom with knowledge.
But perhaps wisdom begins somewhere much smaller.
Perhaps it begins with attention.
With the willingness to look again.
To notice what everyone else has stopped seeing.
To notice what we would rather not see.
To notice the consequences of our own actions.
And then, importantly, to choose.
Not always perfectly.
Not always bravely.
Not always wisely.
But consciously.
Because the moment we notice, something changes.
The world has presented us with information.
And for one brief moment, before instinct, habit, fear, desire or conditioning takes over, we have a choice about what we will do with it.
Perhaps that is one of the smallest—and most consequential—moments in human consciousness.
This is an image of the moment consciousness awakens: the instant we become aware of something beyond what we previously understood and discover that becoming conscious means seeing both light and dark choices. The Moment is always now. This is a companion piece to Sept. 6 blog: The Moment You Notice.
There are books we read because we are interested in them. And there are books we return to because something in the world has changed—and suddenly the book seems to be reading us. For me, Carl Jung’s Aion has become the second kind of book.
I began creating A Visual Field Guide to Carl Jung’s AION — Deciphering Symbols of the Modern Psyche as a very personal experiment: to pull out passages that stopped me in my tracks and place them beside symbols and images I drew myself, later refining those drawings through an AI Pop Art process.
It became something more than an illustrated notebook.
It became a visual map of a psychological landscape I believe we urgently need to enter.
Because Aion is not really a book about ancient Christianity.
It is a book about what happens when human beings encounter the darkness within themselves—and refuse to recognize it.
And that problem has become very modern.
ENTER THE SHADOW | CG Jung
The Shadow Comes First
The first passage I selected is Jung’s discussion of the Shadow.
That was deliberate.
Before we can understand anything else, we have to understand the part of ourselves we would rather not see.
The Shadow contains qualities we reject, repress, deny, or refuse to acknowledge as belonging to us. Individually, this can produce projection: I am not angry; you are angry. I am not cruel; they are cruel. I am not greedy; they are greedy.
Collectively, the consequences become much larger.
A society can project its unwanted qualities onto another political tribe, another race, another nation, another religion, immigrants, intellectuals, elites, the poor, the wealthy, liberals, conservatives—or virtually anyone who can be turned into the Other.
And once we have successfully placed our darkness outside ourselves, we become extraordinarily vulnerable to anyone who promises to destroy it for us.
That is one reason Jung’s Shadow matters so much right now.
The question is not simply:
Who is evil?
The harder question is:
What part of evil are we capable of participating in while believing ourselves to be completely righteous?
That is a much more dangerous question.
Projection and Inflation | CG Jung
Inflation: When the Ego Becomes Bigger Than the Self
My next selection concerns inflation.
Jung used the term psychologically, but it has an obvious collective dimension.
Inflation occurs when the ego identifies with something larger than itself and begins to experience that power, certainty, intelligence, morality, destiny, or authority as personally possessed.
The individual stops saying:
I have encountered something greater than myself.
And begins saying:
I am the greater thing.
This distinction becomes crucial in politics.
A leader can begin to embody something larger than an individual personality: nation, religion, destiny, restoration, justice, security, prosperity, greatness.
Followers may then project their own hopes, fears, rage, longing, and unlived potential onto that person.
The leader becomes larger than life.
The followers become psychologically invested in protecting the projection.
And disagreement begins to feel like betrayal.
Jung’s political psychology is useful precisely because it helps us see that political movements are not made entirely of rational arguments. They can become containers for unconscious psychological forces. Jungian scholarship has explicitly connected inflation with identification with contents of the collective unconscious.
This does not mean that every political leader is a Jungian archetype.
It means something more uncomfortable:
Human beings can turn political leaders into archetypal containers.
And when we do, we stop seeing the human being clearly.
Anima and Animus | CG Jung
The Anima, Animus, and the Shadow
I selected Jung’s discussion of the Anima, Animus, and Shadow because these figures remind us that we are never psychologically as simple as our conscious identities suggest.
There are qualities within us that we have not integrated.
There are voices we have dismissed.
There are ways of thinking and feeling that we have projected onto other people because we could not tolerate encountering them within ourselves. For example, we fear or are ashamed of these qualities so much, we do not recognize them as originating from inside ourselves while freely judging and condemning the person we have cast them onto.
Individuation is therefore not becoming more certain about who we are. Indeed, it may involve increasingly unsure of who we are.
Rather, it is becoming more conscious of everything we are not yet conscious of.
That distinction matters enormously in an age of political certainty.
The person who believes they possess the entire truth is psychologically very different from the person who understands that truth may contain contradictions they have not yet integrated.
Mandala | Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com | CG Jung established the mandala as a symbol of the Self
The Mandala and the Self
Then comes the mandala.
The mandala is one of Jung’s great images of psychic wholeness.
Its importance is almost the opposite of our contemporary obsession with division.
A mandala does not erase opposites.
It contains them like nature does naturally all the time without spectacle, condemnation, or projection. For example, a Crepe Myrtle tree can contain last year’s dried out blossoms and fruit, while sporting dark green foliage and bright pink blossoms. There is no contradiction for the Crepe Myrtle. There is only a continuous becoming and unbecoming, of blooming and of leaves and blossoms dying.
This is what I think we have forgotten.
We keep trying to create wholeness by eliminating everything that contradicts us.
But psychological wholeness is not achieved by destroying the parts we dislike.
It is achieved by becoming conscious enough to hold the tension between opposites.
That is what Jung called individuation.
And perhaps that is also what our civilization desperately needs.
Not uniformity.
Not ideological purity.
Not everyone agreeing.
Conscious differentiation without dehumanization.
Mass Man and the Food of Darkness
The Food of Darkness
One of the most disturbing images in my visual field guide is also one of the most playful.
I drew a toddler being fed worms, spiders, ghosts, and other wonderfully icky things.
The image comes from a much darker passage in Aion, where Jung describes what he calls the “post-Christian spirit”—a distorted spiritual consciousness characterized by arrogance, hysteria, woolly thinking, primal amorality, fanaticism, shallow spiritual commodities, counterfeit art, philosophical incoherence, and utopian promises that can be fed “wholesale” to the masses.
That phrase stayed with me:
fed wholesale to the mass man.
Because what are we fed psychologically?
What ideas are we given before we are old enough to question them?
What fears?
What doctrines?
What certainties?
What stories about good and evil?
What promises about salvation?
What explanations for why we are right and they are wrong?
A child cannot yet distinguish nourishment from poison.
It consumes what the adults around it provide.
That is true psychologically as well as physically.
I grew up in a family of preachers on both sides of my family, so I was surrounded from childhood by biblical stories, theology, symbolism, morality, and competing interpretations of what those ancient stories meant. That upbringing gave me a lifelong fascination with the Bible and with the psychological power of its symbols—but it also taught me something else:
A sacred story can become very dangerous when people stop questioning their interpretation of it.
I learned this in a particularly painful way when my family was driven out of a small South Dakota town after a minority of people strongly opposed my father’s broad and creative ways of interpreting two-thousand-year-old biblical stories.
I don’t tell that story to condemn Christianity.
Quite the opposite.
It taught me how easily something that begins as a living spiritual tradition can become rigid when people become convinced that their interpretation is the only legitimate one.
That experience is part of why Jung’s passage speaks so strongly to me.
He was not simply criticizing religion.
He was warning about spiritual material that has become unconscious, distorted, mass-produced, and consumed without discrimination.
And that is much bigger than religion.
We are fed political stories.
We are fed advertising stories.
We are fed cultural stories.
We are fed algorithmic stories.
We are increasingly fed stories generated by machines.
Some nourish consciousness.
Some make us smaller.
Some teach us to think.
Some teach us what to think.
Some invite us into complexity.
Others give us the intoxicating simplicity of certainty.
The toddler in my drawing doesn’t know whether the spider is food.
That is the point.
Consciousness must eventually learn to discriminate.
We cannot remain children forever, blindly consuming whatever psychological material is placed before us.
This is why Jung’s ideas about the Shadow, good and evil, differentiation, and individuation belong together.
The goal is not to reject everything we were given.
It is to examine it.
Digest it.
Question it.
Keep what is nourishing.
Discard what is poisonous.
And eventually become responsible for what we choose to feed ourselves—and what we feed to those who come after us.
Perhaps that is one of the great tasks of becoming conscious:
to stop being merely the recipient of inherited ideas and become the conscious author of our own inner life.
“When an Inner Situation Isn’t Made Conscious, It Is Lived as Fate” — C.G. Jung
This may be the passage from Aion that most directly explains why I created this field guide.
Jung writes:
“When an inner situation is not made conscious, it happens outside, as fate.”
The full idea is even more powerful: when inner contradictions remain unconscious, the external world can become the stage upon which those contradictions are acted out.
Think about that collectively.
What happens when millions of people carry unresolved fear?
What happens when humiliation becomes political identity?
What happens when people cannot tolerate uncertainty?
What happens when economic anxiety becomes hatred?
What happens when grief becomes rage?
What happens when people project their unlived power onto a leader?
What happens when an entire society becomes divided into opposing psychological camps?
Eventually, the conflict stops being merely psychological.
It becomes political.
Then institutional.
Then historical.
Then potentially catastrophic.
The unconscious has become fate.
Good and Evil: The Necessity of Differentiation | C.G. Jung’s Aion
Several of my selected passages concern good and evil and the psyche’s capacity to judge and differentiate between them.
This is an especially important distinction.
Jung was not advocating moral relativism.
Quite the opposite.
He understood that consciousness requires differentiation.
We have to be capable of saying:
This is destructive. This is exploitative. This is cruel. This is truthful. This is false. This protects human dignity. This destroys it.
But there is a psychological trap here.
We can become so identified with our own goodness that we lose the ability to see our own Shadow.
Then our moral judgment becomes another form of possession.
We become convinced that because we are fighting evil, everything we do in opposition to it must therefore be good.
That is how human beings become capable of terrible things while remaining convinced of their righteousness.
Jung’s warning is not:
It is dangerous to distinguish good from evil, lest you become the evil-doer.
It is rather:
Do not become unconscious while doing something that feel righteous.
“No One Can Possibly Know What the General Good Might Be” — C.G. Jung
This passage stopped me.
Because modern political movements constantly promise some version of the general good.
Security.
Prosperity.
Peace.
Order.
Freedom.
National greatness.
Social justice.
Public welfare.
A better future.
These are powerful ideas.
But Jung asks us to examine what happens when an abstract ideal becomes so sacred that individual human beings disappear beneath it.
The phrase “for the greater good” has probably justified more human suffering than almost any other phrase in history.
That is why consciousness matters.
The question is never merely:
What do we believe?
It is:
What happens to us psychologically when we believe it?
THE SWORD OF DAMOCLES | CG Jung’s Aion
The Antichrist and the Sword of Damocles
This is where Aion becomes especially unsettling.
Jung’s discussion of the Antichrist, the degenerated archetype, and the sword of Damocles is not something I read as a prediction of one particular modern politician.
Rather, I read it as a warning about what happens when an archetypal force becomes distorted and enters collective life through the minds of many people projecting their own unconscious content onto an ordinary person who performs as a god—or, more aptly in Jung’s language, when such a performer becomes the Antichrist.
The distinction matters.
The danger is not simply the individual who claims extraordinary power. It is also the psychological participation of the people who project extraordinary power onto that individual.
An ordinary human being can become something much larger in the collective imagination.
A savior.
A destroyer.
A messiah.
An enemy.
A god.
An antichrist.
And once an archetypal projection takes hold, the person at its center may become almost impossible to see clearly as an ordinary human being.
Jung writes about the danger of this figure being hidden beneath “high-sounding names” such as public welfare, lifelong security, and peace among nations.
That passage is uncomfortable because those are precisely the kinds of words human beings naturally want to trust.
Who could possibly object to security?
Who could object to peace?
Who could object to public welfare?
The danger is not necessarily the words themselves.
The danger is what can hide behind them.
The Sword of Damocles
I had encountered the expression “the sword of Damocles” many times before, but I had never actually stopped to learn the story behind it.
According to the ancient story, Damocles was a courtier who envied the wealth, luxury, and power of the ruler Dionysius II of Syracuse. Dionysius offered Damocles the opportunity to sit in his place and experience the king’s life for himself.
There was only one condition.
Above Damocles’ head, Dionysius had a sharp sword suspended by a single strand of horsehair.
Suddenly the luxurious banquet no longer felt quite so luxurious.
Damocles understood that the power he had envied came with an ever-present danger hanging directly above him.
That is the meaning the phrase has carried ever since: a sword of Damocles is an imminent danger that can fall at any moment, even while everything appears outwardly secure.
I think Jung’s use of this image carries another psychological layer.
The sword does not have to represent only an external threat.
It can represent the danger created when human beings place enormous unconscious power into a person, ideology, institution, or collective fantasy—and then discover that the thing they elevated can also destroy them.
An authoritarian impulse does not always announce itself as tyranny.
Sometimes it arrives promising protection.
Sometimes it arrives promising order.
Sometimes it promises to save us from the chaos we fear.
Sometimes it tells us that surrendering a little freedom is necessary to preserve everything we love.
And sometimes we welcome it.
That is the sword of Damocles.
Not merely that some external tyrant might destroy democracy.
But that our own unconscious longing for certainty, safety, power, revenge, or belonging can help create the conditions in which domination becomes possible.
The sword is hanging above all of us.
The question is whether we are conscious enough to see it.
Why This Matters in 2026
We are living through an extraordinarily polarized political moment.
In the United States, current assessments have documented declining measures of political rights and civil liberties, increasing institutional dysfunction, political polarization, and growing pressure on democratic norms. Public distrust is also profound: in a 2026 Pew Research Center survey, 58% of Americans viewed the Republican Party unfavorably and 59% viewed the Democratic Party unfavorably, while 26% held unfavorable views of both parties.
But I do not think the answer is simply to choose the correct political tribe.
That would be too easy.
The deeper question is whether we can become conscious enough to recognize our own participation in the psychological machinery of division. Whether we are brave enough and strong enough to see that history isn’t just something that happens to people. Human beings participate in creating the psychological conditions from which history emerges.
This is where Jung becomes politically relevant without becoming partisan.
If I only see the Shadow in them, I remain unconscious.
If I can see the Shadow in myself, something changes.
If I can recognize my capacity for hatred, cruelty, arrogance, fear, tribalism, projection, domination, and self-righteousness, I become harder to manipulate through those very forces.
I become harder to possess.
THE NEW ROCK | Two rocks remain in the foreground. One is smooth, white, solid, and completely empty. The other is dark and multicolored—black, brown, yellow—with a tiny luminous blue fish moving inside it. The broken Earth continues falling away around them. | CG Jung’s Aion
The New Rock
The image I created for this passage may be one of the most important in the entire field guide.
Jung writes about “the new rock” taking the place of Christ, connecting it to the idea that, through the descent and indwelling of the Holy Ghost, every individual can become a “new rock”—a living stone.
He refers to I Peter 2:5:
“Be you also as living stones built up.”
I found this fascinating because Jung is describing a movement from something external and singular toward something that can become indwelling and individual.
The sacred is no longer only something we look toward.
It is something we must encounter within ourselves.
That is how I understand the idea of the living stone.
So I drew two rocks.
One is white, solid, and completely empty.
The other is black, brown, and yellow, with a tiny blue fish moving inside it.
Around them, the Earth itself is being shattered by enormous forces.
And beneath the destruction, blue fish continue swimming through the waters.
For me, the waters represent the vast, moving realm of the unconscious. The little fish are living contents within that deeper psychic world—small, mysterious, and capable of moving through places where the solid structures above them are breaking apart.
The empty rock is not evil.
It is simply uninhabited.
It is solid, but nothing is moving inside it.
The other rock has become alive.
Something has entered it.
Something moves within it.
Something connects it to the larger waters.
That distinction matters to me because Jung’s “new rock” is not simply a replacement structure. It is a transformation of what a human being can become.
And this raises an uncomfortable question:
What happens when the old structures that told us who we were begin to shatter?
We are living through a time when many of the structures people once relied upon for meaning and certainty are being challenged—religious institutions, political institutions, national identities, economic assumptions, cultural traditions, even our confidence that technology will necessarily make the future better.
When the world around us becomes unstable, our first impulse is often to build another rock.
Another ideology.
Another leader.
Another certainty.
Another system that promises to tell us what is true.
But Jung’s image suggests another possibility.
Perhaps the task is not simply to find a new structure to worship.
Perhaps the task is to become alive within ourselves.
That is a very different kind of rock.
A living stone does not mean an isolated individual who believes that everything exists inside the ego. Quite the opposite. The little fish in my image remains connected to the waters beyond the rock.
The individual is not the whole ocean.
The individual contains a relationship to something much larger.
And perhaps that is what makes the image of the fish so important.
The fish does not need to understand the entire ocean in order to live within it.
It moves.
It responds.
It remains connected.
It is alive.
The Earth in my drawing is being shattered, but the fish keep swimming.
That may be one of the most hopeful images in this entire book.
Because structures can collapse without everything living inside us having to die with them.
Something deeper can survive the destruction.
Something can continue moving beneath the surface.
Something can emerge.
The Danger of the New Rock
But Jung’s idea also contains a warning.
Every human being who believes they have discovered the new truth can become convinced that they themselves are the new rock.
That is where inflation can return.
The living stone can become another idol.
A spiritual insight can become a doctrine.
A revelation can become a hierarchy.
A symbol can become a weapon.
A person who discovers something alive within themselves can begin believing that they alone possess the truth.
And then we have simply rebuilt the old structure in a new form.
The point is not to replace one absolute certainty with another.
The point is to become conscious enough to remain alive.
Perhaps that is what makes the word living so important.
A living thing changes.
It responds.
It grows.
It encounters what is other than itself.
It cannot be reduced to a rigid doctrine without killing something essential.
That is why I do not see Jung’s “New Rock” as a command to find another external authority.
I see it as an invitation to ask:
What is alive within me?
What have I inherited that is merely a stone?
What have I mistaken for truth because everyone around me believed it?
What living thing might be moving beneath the surface of my conscious life?
And perhaps most importantly:
When the world around me begins to shatter, what will I become?
A dead stone waiting to be rebuilt into another structure?
Or a living stone—connected to the deeper waters, capable of moving, changing, and becoming conscious?
The Earth may fracture.
The old rocks may fall.
But the fish are still swimming.
The Fish, Agape, and the Possibility of Another Way | C.G Jung’s Aion
One of the most beautiful—and strangest—images in my field guide came from Jung’s discussion of the fish.
Jung describes an ancient Christian symbolism in which Christ and those who believe in him are represented as fish. Fish become the food at the Agape, the sacred communal meal. Baptism becomes immersion in a fish pond.
The fish is everywhere.
It lives in the water.
It is immersed.
It is eaten.
It becomes a symbol of Christ and the believer.
And so I drew a fish bowl.
Inside it is the Earth.
Three beautiful fish—one purple, one blue, and one orange-yellow—swim around the planet.
Outside the bowl stands a human being.
But the human being isn’t simply looking at the fish.
The fish are looking back.
And the person’s lips are pressed against the glass, exposing their teeth.
I honestly did not set out with a fully formed explanation for why I drew it this way.
Sometimes the image arrives before the conscious interpretation.
That is part of why I believe symbols are so useful.
They can show us something before we understand it.
Who Is Looking at Whom?
The obvious interpretation would be that the human being is observing the fish.
But look more closely.
The fish are observing the human being too.
That changes everything.
Who is actually being watched?
Who is outside?
Who is inside?
Who is observing?
Who is being observed?
And why are the person’s teeth showing?
Perhaps the human being wants to consume what is inside the bowl.
Perhaps the teeth suggest hunger.
Perhaps they suggest predation.
Perhaps the person is longing to enter.
Perhaps the glass represents the invisible boundary between conscious life and the deeper psychic world.
Or perhaps the image is simply asking us to notice how easily something sacred can become something we want to possess.
The fish are alive.
They are beautiful.
They contain the Earth.
And yet the human being outside them appears to want something from them.
That makes me think about Agape.
Agape is often translated as a form of selfless or divine love, but Jung’s passage introduces an extraordinary paradox: the fish representing Christ and believers also become the food of the sacred communal meal.
Something sacred is received by being consumed.
The symbol therefore contains both love and hunger.
Nourishment and appetite.
Communion and consumption.
Reverence and possession.
That tension feels remarkably contemporary.
We live in a culture that consumes almost everything—including ideas, spirituality, identity, politics, nature, art, and increasingly one another.
Even sacred symbols can become commodities.
Even wisdom can become something we collect rather than something we embody.
The Eyes
And then there are the eyes.
I drew one brown eye and one blue eye.
Both have strange yellow diamond-shaped pupils.
I cannot tell you exactly why.
Perhaps that is the point.
The image came from somewhere deeper than my conscious explanation.
But I notice now that the two eyes are different.
The person does not see with one uniform perspective.
There are two ways of seeing.
Two colors.
Two lenses.
And yet both contain the same unusual golden diamond.
Perhaps this is another image of differentiation without separation.
We do not have to see everything identically in order to share a deeper center.
Perhaps consciousness requires learning to see through more than one lens.
Perhaps the yellow diamond is a spark of something more difficult to name—the strange, precious, watchful center that remains when the ordinary way of seeing is disrupted.
I don’t want to decide for the viewer what the eyes mean.
I would rather let them remain slightly mysterious.
Because that is what symbols do at their best.
They open a door without telling us exactly what we will find on the other side.
Baptism: Immersion
Jung’s reference to baptism as immersion in the fish pond adds another layer.
To be baptized is literally to be immersed.
You don’t stand outside the water and study it.
You enter.
That feels important psychologically.
There is a profound difference between observing consciousness and allowing yourself to be changed by an encounter with the unconscious.
We can study Jung.
We can read about the Shadow.
We can collect archetypes.
We can discuss individuation.
We can even become very knowledgeable about psychology.
And remain completely dry.
At some point, we have to enter the water.
The fish are already there.
They don’t need to be convinced that the water exists.
They live in it.
Perhaps this is part of what the ancient fish symbolism was expressing: spiritual transformation is not merely intellectual agreement.
It is immersion.
FATE OR DESTINY? The person emerges from the water onto a landscape divided between darkness and dawn. Behind them are fragments of the shattered world. Ahead is an open path. The Shadow remains beside them, integrated rather than defeated. The tiny blue fish appears briefly in the water behind them. The person looks toward the horizon. The screen slowly fills with light.
Another Way
This is why I call this section The Possibility of Another Way.
The fish don’t conquer the human being.
The human being doesn’t conquer the fish.
They simply look at one another across the glass.
For one moment, there is recognition.
That may be enough to begin.
Perhaps another way becomes possible when we stop asking:
How do I possess this symbol?
and begin asking:
What is this symbol asking me to see?
The fish may represent Christ.
They may represent believers.
They may represent the sacred food of Agape.
They may represent the unconscious life moving beneath the surface of consciousness.
They may represent something else entirely.
I don’t think a symbol has to have only one meaning.
Perhaps that is one of its gifts.
The purple, blue, and orange-yellow fish are different from one another, but they share the same water.
The Earth rests among them.
The human being stands outside.
And for a moment, they are all looking at one another.
Maybe that is the possibility of another way:
not domination, not consumption, not projection—but relationship.
To see.
To be seen.
To remain different without becoming enemies.
To enter the water rather than merely standing beside it.
And perhaps, finally, to discover that the thing we were trying to consume was actually trying to teach us how to live.
Why I Made This Field Guide
I did not make this book because I think everyone needs to become a Jung scholar.
I made it because I think we need symbols.
We live in an age saturated with information and starved for psychological language.
We have endless images, headlines, videos, political arguments, algorithms, advertisements, artificial intelligence, propaganda, outrage, entertainment, and distraction.
But information does not automatically produce consciousness.
Sometimes it produces the opposite.
More information can simply give the unconscious more material with which to build its projections.
Symbols work differently.
A symbol slows us down.
It asks us to look.
And then to look again.
That is why I drew these images.
The drawings are not illustrations of Jung’s ideas in any academic sense. They are my attempts to see what the words were showing me.
Sometimes I understood what I was drawing.
Sometimes I didn’t.
And sometimes the meaning arrived only later.
That, too, is part of what I have learned from Jung: consciousness does not always come first. Sometimes we encounter an image, a dream, a symbol, or a feeling before we understand what it is trying to tell us.
The AI Pop Art refinement became another layer of that process—a meeting between an ancient psychological text, a human hand, and a contemporary machine.
That combination itself feels strangely appropriate for our moment.
We are creating new technologies faster than we are developing the consciousness necessary to use them wisely.
Perhaps that is why we need symbols now more than ever.
Not to give us answers.
But to slow us down long enough to ask better questions.
Wake Up Before We Call It Fate
This is ultimately why I stopped my selections where I did.
The final passage comes from Deuteronomy 32:39.
There is something about ending there that feels right.
Because Aion is not comfortable reading.
It does not allow us to remain innocent.
It asks us to descend.
To look at the Shadow.
To confront inflation.
To recognize projection.
To differentiate good and evil.
To discover the Self beneath the divided ego.
To understand that what remains unconscious can become fate.
And to recognize that the greatest danger may not always be something happening to us.
Sometimes the danger is something happening through us.
That is why I believe we are living under a psychological sword of Damocles.
Not because catastrophe is inevitable.
But because unconsciousness has consequences.
And because our participation matters.
The projections we place onto other people matter.
The fears we refuse to examine matter.
The ideals we elevate without questioning matter.
The power we surrender in exchange for certainty matters.
The stories we consume—and the stories we feed to others—matter.
The way out is not perfection.
It is consciousness.
It is the willingness to ask:
What am I projecting?
What am I refusing to see?
Where have I become inflated?
What part of myself have I placed entirely in the Shadow?
What am I calling evil because I cannot bear to recognize some version of it in myself?
What ideal has become so sacred to me that I can no longer question what it permits me to do?
What am I surrendering in exchange for certainty?
And perhaps most importantly:
What happens when I refuse to wake up?
Jung believed that the task of consciousness was not to eliminate darkness but to become conscious of it.
That is why these symbols matter now.
Because we do not need more people who are absolutely certain that they are on the side of the light.
We need more people willing to carry a light into the darkness and actually look at what is there.
That is what this little visual field guide is for.
Not answers.
Not certainty.
A flashlight.
A mirror.
A map.
And perhaps, at this particular moment in history, a small reminder:
Wake up before the unconscious becomes fate.
Because fate is not the same thing as destiny.
The unconscious may shape the road ahead.
But consciousness gives us the possibility of choosing where we go.
Feature Archetypal Animation
The Shadow — A Visual Field Guide to Carl Jung’s Aion
Videos and Images made by Genolve: A symbolic journey through Jung’s Aion—from Shadow and projection to consciousness and the choice between Fate and Destiny.
The Living Symbol 03:10 — Stability: Slow-to-moderate cinematic ambient with low cello drones, glassy synth pads, muted ritual percussion, distant piano notes, and tense minor harmonies resolving toward suspended hopeful chords. No flashy solos; subtle pulses, watery textures, and eerie crescendos support mystery, unease, and awakening.
Postscript: From the Psyche to the World
There is another place where I have been exploring these same questions—not through Jungian symbols, but through story.
My Sapience series asks what happens when humanity fails to wake up in time.
In Sapience: The Moment Is Now, I imagined a near-future world in which political corruption, concentrated power, ecological collapse, and humanity’s refusal to confront its own Shadow bring civilization toward a breaking point. Book Two carries that journey much further. It follows a young girl coming of age in a world already devastated by catastrophic climate change—a world where more than eight billion people have been reduced to fewer than three billion within three decades.
This is not a prediction.
It is a possibility.
It is an exploration of what could happen if humanity continues to ignore what it already knows.
And this is where Aion and Sapience meet.
Jung wrote that when an inner situation is not made conscious, it is lived as fate.
That word matters to me.
Because I do not use fate and destiny as synonyms.
Fate is what happens when we remain unconscious. Destiny is what becomes possible when we awaken and choose.
Moment, the young protagonist of Sapience, is given a chance to make that choice. She inherits a world shaped by the choices of those who came before her. She cannot undo what has already happened. But she can decide what she will do with what she has inherited.
That is the question at the heart of the entire series:
What will you choose? Fate or Destiny?
Book Two of Sapience is coming soon via IngramSpark.
And perhaps that is ultimately why I keep returning to these questions—through Jung, through symbols, and through fiction.
Because the future is not simply something waiting for us.
It is something we are choosing, together, right now.
Aion Archetype — A Visual Field Guide to Carl Jung’s Aion
A visual journey through the archetype of conscious transition—exploring Shadow, projection, good and evil, the Self, collective psychology, and the choice between Fate and Destiny through Jung-inspired art.
What I actually meant to search for was the Agora Report.
It turned out to be one of those happy accidents that changes how you think.
Because the ancient Greek word agora means far more than a marketplace.
The Agora was where commerce happened.
It was where ideas were exchanged.
Where citizens debated.
Where philosophy emerged.
Where democracy was practiced—not merely through voting, but through conversation.
The Agora was where a society paid attention to itself.
Crisis of Consciousness
Over the past month I have read four very different reports. They came from different organizations, different disciplines, and different political perspectives. Yet they all seem to be describing the same crisis.
The report showing roughly $79 trillion transferred upward since 1975 is astonishing.
Democracy cannot flourish when economic power becomes radically concentrated.
People lose not only wages.
They lose agency.
The Agora report shows how fewer and fewer citizens possess real influence affecting the lives of millions, while the RAND report documents how a discrete few have accumulated billions by bypassing tax regulations and bribing politicians so that they pass policies that are favorable to them. This becomes a power, as we are witnessing now, more powerful than governments themselves.
RAND shows how roughly $79 trillion transferred upward since 1975
III. Climate
Years ago, while writing Sapience, one of my characters reflected:
“Climate Change happened faster than anyone anticipated, even the most ardent climate scientist.“
Later she observes:
“Multis don’t suffer, and so they never learn.”
“In the end, people came to understand that it wasn’t the climate that needed changing, it was human consciousness.“
I wrote these words more than a decade ago. Now, as we enter the hottest summer yet recorded in human history, her reflections ring more true than fictional.
The Garden is an individual’s mind space and is where consciousness is cultivated. The Agora is where individual consciousness meet to create a shared reality.
Recent climate reports, including the landmark Global Tipping Points report and studies published in journals like One Earth, indicate we are rapidly crossing thresholds for irreversible ecosystem collapse. While some systems—such as widespread coral reefs—have passed a point of no return, scientists emphasize that every fraction of a degree matters to prevent cascading “hothouse Earth” scenarios.
Recent scientific reports and analyses highlight several critical factors regarding the “point of no return”:
The 1.5°C Threshold: For the first time, a three-year period breached the critical 1.5-degree limit. Crossing this threshold is triggering cascading consequences that cannot be reversed on human timescales.
Ecosystem Collapse: Warm-water coral reefs are undergoing an almost unstoppable die-off, marking Earth’s first major climate tipping point. Additionally, systems like the Amazon rainforest and the West Antarctic ice sheets are at risk of irreversible changes if warming and deforestation continue.
Hothouse Earth Trajectory: A study published in One Earth highlighted that continued heating could trigger climate feedback loops, locking the planet into a “hothouse Earth” state. While this points to potentially irreversible transitions, scientists urge that immediate cuts to fossil fuel emissions are still vital to mitigate further damage.
Point of no return: a hellish ‘hothouse Earth’ getting closer, scientists say; Feb 11, 2026, The Guardian — https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/11/point-of-no-return-hothouse-earth-global-heating-climate-tipping-points
Are We Approach the Point of No Return for Irreversible Climate Damage? April 2026, DailyMotion — https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xa30p8s
Climate tipping points are being crossed, scientists warn ahead of COP30; by Alison Withers, Oct. 13, 2025, Reuters — https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/cop/climate-tipping-points-are-being-crossed-scientists-warn-ahead-cop30-2025-10-12/
A point of no return on climate,Rebecca Speare-Cole , 13th October 2025, The Ecologist — https://theecologist.org/2025/oct/13/point-no-return-climate
Overshoot: The World Is Hitting Point of No Return on Climate, Fred Pearce, Jan 28, 2026, YaleEnvironmant360 — https://e360.yale.edu/features/1.5-degrees-tipping-points
IV. Getting Rid of Democracy When It Interferes with Profits
The last report forms the last corner of the Public Square. It is the culmination of the three other reports that shows how the shared space of governance, justice, and reality can dissolve faster than it takes to build and maintain them. The report by More Perfect Union about Peter Thiel and other tech lords to circumvent traditional government systems and taxation so that they can mover faster, break things, and make more money.
Not because Peter Thiel is uniquely evil.
Rather because it illustrates a philosophical endpoint.
If democracy becomes inconvenient…
replace democracy.
Replace governments with investors.
Replace citizens with customers.
Replace constitutions with contracts.
Replace public accountability with shareholder returns.
That’s not merely an economic change.
It’s a change in consciousness.
In Sapience: The Moment Is Now, massive Multinationals rule the world after it Falls over the Climate Cliff
More Perfect Union, a progressive nonprofit newsroom, actively reports on the expanding power of corporate monopolies, billionaire-backed “corporate cities” (like “network states” or “freedom cities”), and corporate land grabs. They investigate how massive tech companies and billionaires are attempting to bypass federal and local regulations to build their own corporate-governed enclaves.
Their reporting uncovers how these corporate states threaten traditional democratic governance, labor rights, and working-class communities.
Key Reporting Themes
“Freedom Cities” & Network States: They track how wealthy investors attempt to establish special development zones where corporations circumvent federal regulations (e.g., bypassing the FDA or EPA) to test unproven technologies.
Private Governance: Their investigations explore the threat of master-planned, privately governed corporate cities—like the billionaire-backed California Forever project—and how they disenfranchise residents by placing civic infrastructure into private hands.
Corporate Dominance & Water Rights: Reporting covers how Big Tech data centers (e.g., Amazon, Google) drain local municipal resources, such as in Indiana and Virginia, while receiving massive tax subsidies.
Worker Exploitation: They highlight specific instances where companies construct massive, lightly regulated industrial zones without proper permits or environmental oversights, directly harming the health and living conditions of surrounding working-class neighborhoods.
Sources:
We Uncovered The Master Plan That Peter Thiel Doesn’t Want You To See; June 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iLf2h_fo-w&t=290s
I Live Next To Amazon’s Largest Data Center. They’re Stealing Our Water, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjkaYyysYhA
I Worked At A Google Data Center: What I Saw Will Shock You. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLX_w0TtBpY
We Went to the Town Elon Musk Is Poisoning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VJT2JeDCyw
This Is the First American City That Will Run Out of Water. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QAARB4bNTE
More Perfect Union (media organization) — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_Perfect_Union_(media_organization)
A lobbying group in the US proposes the creation of corporate governed “freedom cities” — https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/1j9o9zc/a_lobbying_group_in_the_us_proposes_the_creation/
Bearing Witness
Sustain the Flame – Full (Best Version) Women’s March on Washington 2017
For years I thought I was documenting history.
But recently, I have come to realize that perhaps history was documenting me.
The thousands of hours spent livestreaming protests, interviewing strangers, watching movements rise and fall—they were changing my own consciousness.
At the time, I thought the work itself was the destination.
Now I suspect it was the apprenticeship.
The streets of Washington became my classroom. I witnessed hope and fear, courage and anger, celebration and grief. I watched strangers embrace, strangers argue, and strangers discover common purpose. I learned that democracy is far more than elections or institutions—it is a living relationship between people, sustained only when they continue showing up for one another.
Looking back, I realize I wasn’t simply collecting footage. I was learning to pay attention.
Not the kind of attention demanded by social media or the twenty-four-hour news cycle, where each day erases the one before it. I was learning a quieter form of attention—one that searches for patterns instead of headlines, asks questions before reaching conclusions, and recognizes that every event is part of a much larger story.
That realization has also softened one of my disappointments. Recently, I found myself wishing that the years I spent documenting these moments had been more widely recognized. But recognition was never the true gift those years offered me. The gift was perspective. They prepared me to see connections that I could not have seen otherwise.
Today, as I read studies about democracy, economic inequality, climate disruption, and the growing influence of corporate power, I no longer see separate stories. I see a single tapestry woven from countless threads. Each report illuminates a different part of the same pattern.
Perhaps that is what the ancient Greeks understood when they gathered in the Agora. It was never merely a marketplace or a public square. It was a place where citizens learned to think together—to listen, to question, and to cultivate the quality of attention that democracy requires.
Our modern Agora may no longer be a stone courtyard in Athens. It is scattered across books, documentaries, research reports, conversations, podcasts, and yes, even the streets where ordinary people gather to make their voices heard.
The question is not whether the Agora still exists.
The question is whether we are willing to enter it with curiosity rather than certainty, understanding rather than performance, and wisdom rather than outrage.
Because democracies do not rise or fall solely in legislatures or courtrooms.
They rise or fall first in the quality of our collective consciousness.
Playlist of Bearing Witness to a Decade of Documenting Changes in America
In thinking about an archetype for this blog, I settled on The Steward, specifically The Steward of the Agora, the collective space where ancient Greeks came to share ideas and discuss topics important to the community and times.
Here, one of the central characters travels with his AI companion, Ra, searching for a way to transform human consciousness—before humanity tumbles over the Climate Cliff for a second and final time.
When we last left them, they were grappling with the legacy of Qin Shi Huang, China’s First Emperor—a figure I explored in depth in Wisdom Guardians: Loyalty Over Truth: From Qin Shi Huang to Trump | #7. He didn’t make it into Sapience (too many ruthless rulers, not enough pages), but that’s why the Wisdom Guardians podcast exists: to fill in the gaps, tracing the egos that bent civilizations to their will.
This passage marks the transition from ancient China into the fertile cradle of Mesopotamia—Sumer, Akkad, Babylon—before sweeping to Akhenaten’s Egypt and then back again, through thousands of years of empire building and collapse. And what emerges, when you step back, is sobering: for all our progress, the modern era isn’t nearly as different from those ancient times as we’d like to believe.
Who Broke the Timeline? An aerial view of northern Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and the Mediterranean Basin. A new study led by University of Wisconsin–Madison’s John Kutzbach shows that changes in Earth’s orbit, greenhouse gases, and ice sheets influenced the planet’s climate over the last 140,000 years and may have provided wetter, greener corridors at times that permitted human migration out of Africa and into the Middle East. Image courtesy of Google Earth
The lush green mountains of the Qin Empire disappear. Yong Xing-li finds himself standing on a hill overlooking the Isthmus of Suez. The same drying climate that forced the Indo-Aryan tribes further north to migrate and contributed to the Indus valley’s civilization collapse is drying out the lands of Mesopotamia. A vast desert already has northern Africa in its grips forcing most of the native tribes towards the Nile River valley and the Fertile Crescent is destine for the same fate.
Who Broke the Timeline? Field studies in southeastern Morocco, just a few kilometers away from the site of this dust storm, show that electric fields generated by blowing sand boost dust emissions up to 10 times more than expected from wind alone. PAVLIHA/ISTOCKPHOTO | Science
In the East, a darkness grows. Yong Xing-li wonders if it’s rain. It approaches fast, and he soon sees it is not billowing clouds of rain but rather dust. They move like creatures devouring everything into their dusty darkness. It blots out sun, then swallows Yong Xing-li in its smothering embrace. Finely broken bits of rocks pound his face. It’s hard to breathe. Gasping for air, Yong Xing-li reaches for the kill switch to end the simulation when the swirling dust separates and forms a bubble around him.
Dust pelts the bubble from all directions. There’s no form or shape to anything as if he was swallowed into a static pattern of an old television set. The dust begins to clump by color. Brown dust particles form mountains and high plains. White dust crowns their peaks and creates high, arid lands. Green dust particles settle into valleys with yellow-green dust making high valleys and dark green dust creating low valleys. Blue grains of dust form into long ribbons that tumble from the mountains, meander through the plains and valleys, then empty into seas.
The image is clear. This is Mesopotamia. The telltale narrow neck of where the Euphrates and Tigris rivers flow closest together looks like an entrance into Eden from this perspective. And it is. Between these two rivers is a place where everything needed to live is available in great abundance.
Who Broke the Timeline? Ancient Mesopotamian | Teaching WikiWho Broke the Timeline? Humans Due to Conscious Awareness Can Change the Color and Course of Consciousness | Image: Genolve
Suddenly, Yong Xing-li all on his own without any help from Ra understands these were the first cities of Sumer, simply from a different perspective. Each one beating to its own unique rhythm, its color, as it grew around its whirl. Just as individual cells clustered together to better meet the needs of daily existence, so too do civilizations. Just as simple creatures evolved digestive tracks to better capture, distribute, and discard energy, so too did civilizations. Their digestive track is simply on a different level of being the one created when man used his focused beam of conscious attention not just to scan for threats and opportunities in the external world but to scan his inner world too.
Who Broke the Timeline? The Invisible Force and Flow of Consciousness | Image: Genolve
Along the banks of the Euphrates, Yong Xing-li watches as colorful whirling clusters form along the river’s edge. To the north, near the narrow neck, yellow, rose, and turquoise whirls grow. To the south, near the mouth, baby blue, orange, and purple swirls grow. He watches as each whirl pulls different colored particles around it into its vortex. Blue particles of water disappear into the vortex. Green particles constantly flow into the whirl vanish. Brown particles dematerialize into the eddy. Red particles are pulled out of all the dominate color patterns dissipate in whirlpools.
Who Broke the Timeline? When Human Consciousness Swirls Together in the Same Direction, Cities and Civilizations Bloom | Image: Genolve
When he did this, a murky plane of unmanifested potential became visible. It is a vast plane full of strange feelings, nebulous dreams, terrifying possibilities, bone-chilling fears, shadowy ideas, half-baked notions, circular ruminations, stifling opinions, rigid convictions, and backwards-looking reflections. Using his beam of focused conscious attention, he could choose actions different than what nature would have made for him through his instinctual responses to happenings in the world. By combining this focused effort with others in this tribe, the collective effort was 10 times, 100 times, 10,000 times more powerful than the work of one man working alone.
Who Broke the Timeline? Choice Is a Consequence of Conscious Awareness | Image: Genolve
The more people used this ability together to accomplish collective action, the more synchronized their inner dialogues grew with everyone else. Talking to oneself is of course thinking. There is a natural beat or rhythm to thinking just as there is to a heartbeat, breathing, or between waking and sleeping states of consciousness. Shared language, customs, and routines synchronize an individual’s thinking rhythm with the group’s rhythm. These group patterns are further colored by flourishes such as local idioms, beloved stories, and the type of humor enjoyed by the people.
Who Broke the Timeline? Ancient City | Image: Genolve
Getting everyone to flow in the same direction is harder, but there are lots of ways to encourage cooperative flow. Routines, rules, and laws are common practices to introduce and enforce conformity and a commonly agreed way of doing things. But far more powerful is shared beliefs. Nothing galvanizes a group of humans faster or stronger than shared beliefs that capture and store the peoples’ collective hopes and dreams as well as their nightmares and fears in a collective reservoir of potential. This reservoir serves as a source of energy upon which everyone can draw as they work together to make their hopes and dreams come true while keeping the fiendish, nightmarish possibilities at bay. Rites and rituals create a powerful spin that keeps everyone moving mostly in the same direction and this spin creates the vortex around which civilizations grow.
Who Broke the Timeline? Swirls of Light — Social Psychological Forces Holding Cities and Civilizations Together | Image: Genolve
Yong Xing-li knows the pale-yellow swirl furthest north near the narrow neck of the Euphrates and Tigris is the Sumerian city of Sippar. It swirls around its patron god Shamash, God of Sun and Light. Borsippa beats to turquoise while twirling around Nabu, God of Writing and Wisdom. Kish thumps to rose while rotating around Zababa, God of the Hunt. Downstream near the mouth of the Euphrates, Ur beats to baby blue while spinning around Nanna, Moon God and King of all Gods. Uruk reverberates to purple while whirling around Inanna, Goddess of Love. Eridu quivers to orange while spiraling around Enki, a trickster god.
As each city grows bigger, smaller swirls grow and flow inside the bigger swirl creating complicated rosette patterns. From the center of these blooms of civilization emerge the patron god or goddess of each city. They have cow ears or baby goat horns or hair made of wheat emerge, symbols of the collective force that tamed wheat and barley, goats, and cows in service of the people. Buds of civilizations appear up and down the Tigris and Euphrates rivers and between them. Swirls even emerge in the mountains or far from rivers and streams as people unleash their collective intelligence to solve all sorts of problems of survival.
Who Broke the Timeline? Swirls of Light — the Invisible Forces Holding Societies and Civilizations Together | Animation: Genolve |Music: Mesopotamia – Mesopotamia – Rauschhaus ♪
Tendrils of trade, communication, culture, and technology grow between the blooming city-states of Sumer and other newly bloomed civilizations such as the Amorites, Elamites, and Gutians. Shimmering networks of trade and cooperation light up Mesopotamia with the glistening achievements of civilization. But a collective will can manifest evil as well as good. Such collective manifestation is also on par with the power of a God—the wrath of a God. Dark spots of conflict erupt along vital trading routes. Sippar wars with Borsippa. Uruk wars with Kish. At any one point in time during the 2,000 years Sumerian civilization controlled the region, they warred with each other almost as much as they warred with other nearby civilizations who infringed on their resources or land. The gentle, peaceful agrarian Gods and Goddesses who first emerged soon became adept in the art of war and grew fiercer features and powers.
Who Broke the Timeline? Sargon The Great King Of Akkad |Ancient Origins
One dark yellow Amorite swirl far to north along the Tigris River grew bigger and bigger. It soon turned its tendrils of trade into ramparts of war conquering Sumer’s rainbow-colored city-states and turning them into the dark yellow beat of king Sargon of Akkad. He is the first of the Sumerian kings, although he was an Amorite who spoke a different language, to conquer all the city-states of Sumer and bringing them under one rule. He is the first to establish an empire in Mesopotamia. The pulse of the Akkadian Empire dominates the Mesopotamia for 200 years.
Changing climate chips away at rigid structures imposed by the Akkadian Empire, which are further weaken by furious Gutians who descend from the Zagros Mountains attacking Akkadian outposts to reclaim their independence. The Empire falls, allowing erratic, unstable independent city-states to return to the Sumerian way.
Who Broke the Timeline? The Gutian Invasion: What Really Caused the Fall of the Akkadian Empire? |Ancient Origins
Trading networks reappear, but Sumer is a shadow of itself. New realities of empires mean city-states must learn how to bundle their strengths or fall prey to another ambitious ruler. Broken bits of the Akkadian-speaking empire reassemble into the Assyrians in the north and the Babylonians in the south. Elam forms as a power in the south, the Gutains galvanizes as a power in the east, the Hittites grow into a power in the north, and to the west Canaan and Palestine are forming into powers. And still further west, Egypt is growing as a fierce force that will soon need to be reckoned with.
Babylon is the first to take control of the Fertile Crescent under Hammurabi’s hand. The Hittites conquer Babylon and extend their control into new territories into Asia Minor while Egypt gobbles up the lower half of the Fertile Crescent extending its empire all the way to the Euphrates River. Sea People attack the Hittites that make them vulnerable to the Assyrians who are rising as a formidable power. The Assyrians conquer the Hittites and the Egyptians too, creating the biggest and most ruthless empire yet. Nebuchadnezzar strikes back, conquering Assyria and claiming its empire for Babylon. Persia led by Cyrus the Great conquers the second Babylon empire, taking Mesopotamia and Egypt as well as adding parts of India and Greek Islands to create the Achaemenid Empire. It is now the biggest empire ever assembled and lasts for almost 600 years until Alexander the Great strikes back. He conquers Persia and claims its massive empire for Macedonian. Desiring even more land, he pushes deeper into India but does not get too far. He dies young and his mighty Macedonian Empire crumbles into smaller warring kingdoms, which leave the civilized western world sitting on the tip of a pin.
The only way to get more land or resources in this part of the world is to conquer it. In three short centuries, the Roman does precisely that but not without some difficulties. The dust storm obliterates the colorful maps of moving particles, and it is just grey chaos storming around him and darker than ever.
Yong Xing-li wonders what Ra plans to show him next or if he will show him anything else. The torrent of raging dust only seems to be growing stronger and darker. It pelts at his bubble shielding him from its abrasive edges that threaten to cut him into millions of tiny pieces as small as the swirling dust all around him. For a moment, he’s not sure if he’s in a dust storm or a deluge of formless, meaningless quanta and his bubble of space rapidly begins to recede.
Ra’s bodiless voice resounds not only in his diminishing bubble but everywhere outside of it. He asks, “Do you ever wonder why man’s timeline starts in the middle?”
Who Broke the Timeline? RA | Image: Genolve
“No Ra,” Yong Xing-li replies growing ever more nervous as his bubble shrinks further and further now little bigger than his own body, “I’ve never really thought about it. Why does it start in the middle?” He pushes ineffectively against the shrinking bubble to no avail. His little universe of calm and orderliness is about to be swallowed by dust when another distinctly different voice resounds that instantly reclaims all his lost standing and his bubble is restored.
“It’s because of me. It is my story that defined time. It is my story the marks year zero for all of humanity. I made the timeline start in the middle.”
Who Broke the Timeline? Bust of Dust, Caesar | Image: Genolve
As this strange new voice echoes away into the blowing grains of dust, the bust of Julius Caesar forms outside the edge of his bubble glaring at him. This bust of marble is very much alive. Yong Xing-li is very much at a loss of what to do for he has never in his life had to interact with just a head.
Another voice booms in the howling dust: “No, it is because of me. I am the one who put Spartacus down and nailed him and his 6,000 men to crosses along the Appain Way. I am the one who saved Rome from free fall. It is my story that defines time and divided it into before and after.”
Who Broke the Timeline?Marcus Licinius Crassus | Bust found in the Licinian Tombs in Rome, traditionally identified as Crassus | Wiki
To Julius Caesar’s right, the marble bust of Marcus Lucinius Crassus, one of the richest men of Rome during his time forms from the dust. He is just as living and just as livid as Julius Caesar.
Another bodiless booms in the dust, laughing in disdain at the other two busts. “You both are wrong,” the voice booms with contempt and scorn. “It is me who defies time and starts the timeline for the men to come. I am the one who rescued Rome from famine and hungry. I crossed the high seas defeating the pirates and confronting Mithridates of Pontus who was raising an army to strike at Rome in a weaken and vulnerable state. I marched my men through the Caucasus Mountains, redrawing the map for Rome and making the eastern Mediterranean Red for Rome.”
To Julius Caesar’s left, the marble bust of Pompey the Great forms from the swirling dust. One of the greatest military men of Rome’s long history. His living arrogance hoovers over Julius and Crassus like a gloomy cloud.
“You both remain as deluded in death as you were in life,” Julius retorts. “Your head was cut off Crassus in the Battle of Carrhae and put on a stick that the Parthians used in Euripides play The Bacchae. And Pompey, your head was delivered to me on a platter after you went running yellow to Egypt where my friend Ptolemy XIII Theos Philopator, Pharaoh of Egypt, met you and cut off your head.”
“And you were stabbed 23 times and bled to death on the Senate floor not more than 2 years later,” a booming voice of three resounds making Yong Xing-li spin around on his heels to see three more marble busts materializing from the dust. It is none other than Marcus Antonius better known as Mark Antony, Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, and Caesar’s grandnephew and adopted son, Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus better known as Octavian.
Who Broke the Timeline? Busts of Second Triumvirate | Octavius (Caesar Augustus), Lepidus, Marc Antony | From Octavian to Augustus: A Republic Ends Itself in a Power-Grab |Brewminate
In unison they boom, “It is I who avenged you and serve as the marker dividing time from before to after,” though the tone of each man is clear; he alone did it.
These are the men of the Second Triumvirate who play the sentiment of the people of Rome so finely, it turns forever away from its founding as a Republic and into an Empire that shreds and dominates Western Civilization for centuries to come.
The six busts stare and glare at each other in such defiant domination Yong Xing-li is sure their glowering stare will crack his fragile bubble into millions of pieces, and he will be swallowed once again in the ravenous dust storm that he is certain he will not survive.
Who Broke the Timeline? First Triumvirate – Pompey, Caesar, Crassus |The ImpactWho Broke the Timeline? Second Triumvirate | Strategic alliance formed in the 1st century BC by Mark Antony, Lepidus, and Octavian | Coins
Then a soft and beautiful glowing light appears above his bubble and a man appearing in the center of the light holding a lamb in one arm and a Shepard’s crook in his other hand. Without moving his lips, he says, “I’m afraid it is I who created a rift in the timeline.”
No sooner than these words are conveyed to Yong Xing-li, than a tremendous earthquake shakes the ground upon which he stands opening a tremendous rift that extends down and down and down to who knows where. Yong Xing-li barely jumps to one side in time.
From the depths of this dark fissure in the Earth the most menacing voice Yong Xing-li has ever heard thunders up from the darkness along with two piecing points of glowing green eyes, “It is all my doing. I created the schism in time.”
A decidedly repulsive creature crawls from the gapping cavity and wraps its long snake-like body around Yong Xing-li’s legs and body, placing its hideous head face to face with his head. It’s breath reeks of the dead and dying of a million, billion, trillion beings.
Who Broke the Timeline? Serpent |Image: Genolve
Yong Xing-li is about to pass out when the whole shebang disappears, and he is simply standing on a hill looking out over the Isthmus of Suez again. Ra’s familiar, gentle voice returns.
There was most certainly a countdown during this time, but truth is always much richer and more complex than one man’s ego. What is for certain, the currents of power fluctuating wildly during this time set in motion a wave so powerful it would eventually envelope the entire globe in a spirit of rage and revenge that echoes into this very moment.
I have made a library for you pursue at your leisure for the human mind has evolved as such to only be convinced of things if it has verified and checked them out for itself. That is of course if it is still individualized. The collective mind is a different animal. With its power and might to conduct actions in the world once reserved to the gods, it remains feeble and afraid deferring its right to decide to the majority.
We explore just three more Ruthless Rulers arising in the flows and counter flows of Western Civilization. The rest I leave for you to discover what the others did in the name of seeking the power and glory.
Who Broke the Timeline? Feature Animation | Who Broke the Timeline? |Music:Ultra Facial! – 036 – james K ♪♪♪ | Animation: Genolve
POSTSCRIPT: Who Broke the Timeline? The Latest Ego Wars
The dust settles. Or does it?
Yong Xing-li stands again on that hill above the Isthmus of Suez, watching the ancient eddies of civilization dissolve into the horizon. Ra is quiet. The six marble busts have crumbled back into the desert from which they came. The serpent has slithered back into its fissure. And for one suspended moment, it seems as though the lesson has finally been learned — that no single ego, however magnificent, however monstrous, however convinced of its own divine right to define time, ever actually does.
Then Ra speaks again.
“Look East. Look West. Look inward. They are at it again.”
And Yong Xing-li knows, with the sick certainty of someone who has just watched ten thousand years of the same story repeat itself, that the Busts of Dust have returned. Not in marble. Not from the swirling sands of Mesopotamia or the Senate floor of Rome. They arrive in real time, beamed directly into the palm of every human hand on Earth — in feeds and posts and declarations, in rocket launches and tariff wars and rallies that fill arenas the way temples once filled with the fervent. The patron gods have new names. The vortices still spin.
The difference — the only difference — is this: Caesar could not split the atom. Pompey did not hold the launch codes. Crassus, for all his obscene wealth, could not buy the atmosphere itself. The ruthless rulers of antiquity could shatter civilizations; the ruthless rulers of now can shatter the timeline for good.
Two men — among others, but none so loud, none so richly endowed with the tools of civilizational leverage — have positioned themselves not merely as definers of an era, but as engineers of the species’ next move. One dreams of leaving Earth entirely, as if the mess here is simply a problem of location. The other dreams of remaking Earth in the image of his appetites, as if the mess here is simply a problem of insufficient loyalty. Both carry within them the ancient vortex — that swirling, hungry thing that has animated every conqueror since Sargon of Akkad: the belief that I am the force around which history should properly organize itself.
History, of course, has heard this before.
It has heard it in the marble mouths of men who were certain their story was the one that broke the timeline. It has heard it in the thundering hooves of armies convinced they were destiny’s instrument. It has heard it rise from every fissure in the Earth, reeking of the dead and dying of a million, billion, trillion beings.
What history has not yet heard — what Yong Xing-li is searching for across ten thousand years of evidence — is the sound of a collective consciousness that chose differently. Not fate. Destiny.
The moment that choice becomes possible is not some distant point in the future.
Ra would tell you — it is always now.
The questions Yong Xing-li and Ra are chasing across the ruins of civilization are the same ones you are living through today. If this postscript found you, perhaps the timeline isn’t broken yet.
Who Broke The Timeline: This Time?
What Our Ancient Ancestors Understood & Modern Man Forgot (or more aptly… ignores)
“Heaven And Hell Are Not What Jesus Preached,” Religion Scholar, Bart Ehrman, said during an interview with Terry Gross on Fresh Air about the end of March of 2020. Bart Ehrman talked about how the ideas of eternal rewards and punishments are not found in the Old Testament or in the teachings of Jesus. He was discussing his new book Heaven and Hell: A History of the Afterlife when at about 36 minutes in he mentioned the End Times. Ehrman said that so many people were talking about how we we all living though the End Times now (i.e., the time of Coronavirus). However, Ehrman points out people have always thought the hard times they were enduring were the End Times. In reality, it was usually due to man’s stupidity.
This is not exactly what Ehrman said. He phrased it much more elegantly than I have paraphrased it, but what he said reminded me of two recent encounters with this idea of man’s stupidity. The first time occurred 2 days before Christmas when my beloved dog died suddenly and unexpectedly in my arms. She had been bleeding internally, but I had missed all the signs. As I stood over her dead body, stroking her soft chocolate hair, I said over and over, “We were so stupid, so stupid, so stupid…”, meaning myself for I knew I had missed all the signs that might have saved her life.
I encountered it again in February, as the gravity of the Coronavirus was sinking in around the world. At this time, terrible reports were coming out of Italy, which had quickly become the epicenter of the novel Coronavirus that was making its way around the world. I was listening to an interview on the BBC with an Italian Emergency Room doctor who said, “Man was stupid in dealing with this disease. We let whole families come in with their loved one who got infected themselves and then spread it far and wide.”
Again, this is not an exact quote, but what the doctor was expressing echoed my own sentiments about my stupidity in the death of my beloved dog. And now Bart Ehrman was expressing this idea with Terry Gross. I haven’t learned much in life, but I have learned to pay attention when things happen in threes.
Heaven And Hell: In the Wake of Death, I Found Comfort in Alan Watts
In the wake of my dog’s death, I had found comfort listening to Alan Watts who often danced around the idea of man’s stupidity in his lectures. In this particular string of 3s, I remembered a particularly memorable tangent he had taken in one lecture. Watts was famous for veering off on tangents in his lectures, but he always linked them back to his main points. Before veering off on this tangent, Watts had discussed the limits of man’s thinking.
Watts artfully drew his audience’s attention to the thing behind the eyes looking out onto the world–asking his audience: “What is the thing that lies behind the eyes?”
Then, Watts answered his own question by saying: “It is the thing we cannot think or perceive or name. It is the nothingness from which all form has risen.”
Heaven And Hell: Watts and His Riddles
Watts’ lectures were full of riddles he attempted to explain through stories, thus the reason for his tangents. In this lecture, Watts veers into this tangential story in this way:
“…the farthest we can go in thinking about nothing [is a question…to try and get to the root of the matter]. Let me put this in another way. The world is formed, [and] now you cannot look for the origin of form in form because what you would get then would be maybe a universe where you couldn’t make out any form at all. [This is] because of us [because of our thinking] so much of it would be like writing a letter on top of a newspaper, and then putting a picture over that, and then doing something else until there wasn’t a single square millimeter of paper left of blank paper! Nobody could read anything. One can read, one can see form, one can see the world because [there is] emptiness:Emptiness [is] the mother of form.”
Watts goes on to talk about how people are really just rascals at their core, playing games and tricking each other. He told the audience he was doing that to them Now. He had hoaxed them all into coming to hear him that night. It was a trap, but he was going to make it an entertaining trap, so they wouldn’t feel so badly about it. He continues talking about how all of life is participating in this game: “The water is going around all day going tttt tttt. The fish and ducks are doing the same going dddd dddd.” Then he gets to the outrage people natural feel upon hearing this, “Well, what do mean we are all just fiddling around…and this is only a game?!”
This is where he gets to his really interesting tangent for he has anticipated the audience’s question: “What do mean life is a game?” And, he answers it for them: “Well, what did you want? Didn’t you want a game? Did you want it to be serious in the end?”
Heaven And Hell: The Van Eyck Tangent
Watts continues saying:
“What I mean think about the question. What kind of a thing would you like God to be what would you like to do for eternity? Really, here is young Van Eyck who paints the eschatological picture of the Last Judgement. What a strange man he must have been where we have heaven above and hell below…and in heaven, here’s God the Father Godthe Son God the Holy Ghost all there together and Virgin Mary and the apostles and they’re all sitting in committee, and they have an aisle you know just like in church. And there they are facing each other. and they’re all sitting there very solidly. I don’t know what it’s about…but below [them] right at the end of the aisle you [can] see where all these apostles are sitting is [the archangel Michael.]”
Heaven And Hell: Van Eyck
“Isn’t Michael a rather gorgeous figure in beautiful armor with wings and underneath him is a bat winged skull and beneath those bat wings are all [mannar of] horror let loose. Michael is about to squash that skull. See [there] with his sword. But below whoow! There are nude bodies some of them pretty comely. They’re all squirming in there, and they’re being eaten by worms, and they are eating the worms, and there’s a kind of a mush. It’s like the sort of situation you find when you turn up a big rock and there’s all that going on underneath.”
“Now, there’s no question whatever the van Eyck the painter had more fun painting that part of the picture [than the top part!] So [it was] the same way with [many of the great painters of those times] they painted every kind of weird surrealistic deviltry going on and they really loved it but they couldn’t admit it…”
Watts goes on, of course, but that’s another story. To me, the crux of what Watts was conveying in this lecture was our inherent ability as human beings to be stupid simply because we are not paying attention to all of who we are as living beings. When something bad happens, we may not consciously think of feel that we have chosen thisthing or that thing to happen in our lives, but if one settles… to really sinks down into the fullness of who one really is… there is something else entirely going on within us. All that stuff going underneath that rock we just have not gotten around to turning up inside our psyche.
I first scribbled this post in a Facebook group where not very many members found it particularly interesting. However, a couple members commented, and one member in particular commented and extended some of Watts thinking, which I will share a little bit below, referring this member as GG and to myself as Bébé.
GG: “If I remember rightly, Alan Watts made the point about what you would do for an eternity, connecting it to the idea that the universe is “playing hide and seek with its self”.
I have contemplated a lot on infinity and eternity during the last few years, since this seems to be the basic deal, that whatever it is we are a part of it could never have begun but must have been going on forever. Since there is movement inwards and outwards ( this seems somehow even like the basic architecture of timespace: a movement inwards and a movement outwards which at every point is always meeting, and thus giving rise to complex and strange kinds of forms ) this also points towards a truly infinite world also in extension, as well as in depth. All our experience also points towards this: we never see an end to life, everywhere there is movement and transformation and events happening, we see neither the smallest nor largest units, there always seems to be more. Physics becomes increasingly exotic, as does mathematics, as does psychology, the more we learn. And so on and so forth, this pattern can be seen everywhere, and it all points towards this infinite eternal multidimensional manifold where for some reason there is even mind and consciousness and experience.
This being the ground of my being, I have wondered, if I could have my greatest wish fulfilled, what would it be?
And the best I have come up with so far, is I would really enjoy to be able to shape shift between all possible and imaginable lifeforms, in such an infinitely large as well as deep space, forever. To live forever, and also live as all possible lifeforms, and thus see and know and experience reality from all possible angles.
The suggestion from Watts that the universe is playing hide and seek with itself might be that this is actually what is happening, and this is the reason why beings are born without strong memories of where they come from, go through an enormous drama of birth and living and death, experience an inner yearning and nostalgia for something timeless and unchanging, until eventually again becoming united with the ultimate source.
The Multiuniverse is among the cosmologically popular explanations for what was before the big bang, this also assumed to be infinite and eternal, along with this exists other models of something more sequential, but even here the main theme is that it never begun and never can end and always have been and will be ongoing.
With this in mind: Is the Multiverse yet another name for God?
It seems clear that both God and the Multiverse share the basic characteristics: forever having existed, full of life in all directions, endless potentiality for new form to arise within it, processes of evolution and learning, and of course intelligent conscious life with self-awareness on a variety of scales and levels. If we assume there are even more intelligent lifeforms than ourselves somewhere in this infinity, or simply assume that evolution of intelligence is a possibility, then this already implies that this possibility has been fulfilled forever ago.
Therefore, both God and Multiverse is a myth of something that contains SUPERINTELLIGENCE and contains as much of it as anyone could like, it having always been a part of the package: the highest possible intelligence forever ago realized and an inherent part of our existence.
Watts indicates that such a superintelligence may be quite playful, feeling in its roots completely secure in its never ending foundations, there might be good reasons to play some games in the meanwhile for nothing other than the pure fun of it, even play some extreme drama, and even pretending to not remember ones origin, searching to come back to it, and since knowing that we have all the time in the world to find the thread back, eventually succeeding. Once again.
That would explain a lot!” 🙂
Bébé : “You are absolutely right! That is exactly what Watts says–the universe is playing a game of hide and seek.
It is a mind warping idea, especially for us living in Western Civilization that does a pretty good job crushing most minds to accept the collective norms of this civilization. Jürgen Hornschuh writes about this a lot, but I believe he is taking a break from this platform as he lives in India and this country is in a massive shut down now.
Where you ask yourself… I have wondered, if I could have my greatest wish fulfilled, what would it be?
How you answer is exactly what Watts says… you would be you doing you right Here & Now. I will attach a song that incorporates this in their music.
Then, you ask: With this in mind: is the Multiverse yet another name for God?
I think you may be right! Have you heard Watts’ lectures about this idea of a super intelligent universe? I can try to find it for you. I was listening to it just before we went into shut down here in VA, so now for whatever reason, I am just not listening to Watts… just trying to feel into what I have heard over the last 2 months of listening. In several of his lectures, he talks about the Earth peopling just like an apple tree apples… and this would not occur in a stupid universe as we have been taught to believe that the universe is a mindless machine… he says that is as crazy an idea of a man with a white beard sitting up on high ruling over heavens and earth… Watts did piss off a lot of people with his ideas… he was a myth burster… but really he was teaching people to release their minds for the boxes of thought we have trapped ourselves inside.
Thank you so much for responding!” ❤️
GG: “We are something the universe is doing” is another idea which when hearing it sounds perfectly reasonable, yet involves such a change from the habitual point of view, a change towards feeling more as a part of the great whole. For me this feeling of being part of the great whole brings a lot of peace, while also makes it all seem so much richer and more interesting. We who live today sure have an enormous gift in the sense of how we can listen to the voice of some of these great masters all the way to our living rooms. Just listening to wise people like Alan Watts, contemplating it and using it as a mirror to reflect back on ones own life, this is a kind of food for the soul.” 🙂
Bébé : “I have been reflecting on your previous comment of if we are eternal energies that your wish might be to be and experience as many forms of being as possible, and I think that would be my wish too. Even the scary ones… I supposed… though that seems insane really! This short song, which is not the lecture that I still need to find, hints at this.
And, yes, Watts goes back to this idea again and again about we are what the universe is doing. It is a beautiful idea. I think I am incubating it right now for the new material I am adding to my story… this the universe is doing man, just as man is doing the universe at the point of Here & Now… I find this so deeply comforting some how.”
GG: “Some of this may move into the realms of speculation but it has been on my mind a lot for several years.
Lets say we accept that the universe is ultimately eternal and life has existed forever. That something like big bang would be yet another moment of change, yet part of something larger pre-existing it, also part of something larger pre-existing it…forever. So some kind of action, movement, transformation happening forever.
Lets also say we believe there is such a thing as evolution. That under some circumstances, life progresses in stages and ascends levels, which means a process of increasing awareness, intelligence, ability, understanding. Learning. We can all relate to this during our own life, some things do evolve, learning and maturation does happen.
Lets also assume there are higher levels of intelligence, awareness, consciousness than humans have known so far. Much points towards this. It seems very unlikely that we are at the top of the evolutionary ladder. More likely that there are enormously much higher levels.
All this seems to me as highly probably true. That the universe could begin out of nothing, for no reason at all, seems like the most impossible of all possible impossibilities! That evolution happens is supported by all our experience. That there are higher undiscovered levels seems overwhelmingly likely.
If this is true, must it then not by necessity be true that Superintelligent life which has evolved to the highest possible levels, has also existed forever? And evolved and developed forever? And created new versions of itself forever?
Then the universe as a whole would indeed be superintelligent. And these higher levels, and dare I say these far more advanced Beings, might be an inherent part of timespace itself. So that all the talk about spirits and angels and gods and entities, are all true, only that the whole truth is exponentially wilder still?
This would explain a lot. I can not see any weaknesses in this reasoning. If we do live within eternal action, there is consciousness, there is evolution, then the highest possible results of this evolution must be expected to always have been a part of this action, at every place where life and consciousness and evolution is taking place.
All this points towards humans having enormously great possibilities if we can somehow get in contact with these higher powers and get help from them.”
Bébé : “I think everything you say is most definitely, highly likely… I agree with all you have said… we each can help evolve and reach higher levels of consciousness by developing ourself. Alan Watts found Buddhism and Hinduism to provide the most helpful daily practices and narratives to possibly do this. But, Watts would always say that it is an individual journey and everything he said should be taken as a story and a form of entertainment. He always nudged his audiences to do their own thinking and make their own conclusions, which is what you do so well Glenn!
Consciousness Warriors are individuals who choose awareness over illusion, truth over propaganda, and inner discipline over unconscious reaction. They are not defined by violence or domination, but by the courage to confront deception within themselves and in the world around them. Drawing strength from self-knowledge, compassion, reason, and moral clarity, they stand firm when collective fear, greed, or authoritarian currents attempt to sweep society into darkness. A Consciousness Warrior recognizes that the real battlefield of our time is psychological, cultural, and spiritual: the struggle for attention, meaning, and human dignity. They resist becoming machine-like servants of systems built on manipulation, and instead work to awaken others through example, creativity, courage, and conscious action. In every age of confusion, these are the people who help turn the tide.
Consciousness Warriors & Sapience
Since 2012, I have worked on a story that I hope (with help from dear friends) will be available this year as a self-published work. As I sunk deeper into this story and discovered more of its terrain, I came to know the Warrior-Priestesses. I was working on the story of the 4th Warrior-Priestess, Sláine (a name from Viking lore) when tragedy befell my family. Now, as I work my way back from this tragedy, I illustrated and summarized some of the story of Sláine. It is these shorts that will follow. As I did this work, I learned about the work of Margret Wheatley and her idea about Warriors for the Human Spirit. Though my work is fiction, its message is about consciousness, climate change, and the gap we collectively stand in Now where the choice is clear: Do we continue to proceed on our current path that is bringing us ever closer to the cliff created by deepening divides between beliefs and the haves and have nots or do we see beyond our current systems and structures and choose something wiser, more compassionate, and sustainable?
Margret says about the warrior training she provides: “Warriors for the Human Spirit are awake human beings who have chosen not to flee. They abide. They serve as beacons of an ancient story that tells of the goodness and generosity and creativity of humanity. You can identify them by their cheerfulness. You will know them by their compassion. When asked how they do it they will tell you about discipline, dedication and the necessity of community. — Warrior in Training
I believe we’ve had such humans among us since the beginning of humanity. Now, we stand at a crossroads where we must choose who we are and what we will do, and we need these warriors again in great numbers. This is where story and storytelling are infinitely important in helping us see around corners and imagine different futures (different realities). This type of knowledge is needed Now to help us make better choices in our Here and Nowfor it is our capacity to imagine that helped humanity become the tool makers and bio-geo engineers of our world that has allowed us to transform our planet through technology and the creation of societies driven by economics. Much good has come from all this, but also bad, and along the way we seem to have discarded or forgotten something essential in ourselves—the more ancient ways of being in the world and wisdom needed to live sustainably and compassionately with each other and all life. But, we are the New Ancient’s rising today. And we can learn once again how to swim in the deeper waters of our consciousness for we have inside ourselves the new stories needed to create a better, more sustainable future (reality). I believe we can reclaim these lost parts of ourselves where wisdom waits patiently.
