1976 to 2026: Two Bicentennials, Two Americas, and the Power of Thirty Percent to Override the Good of NOW

1976 โ†’ 2026 Two Bicentennials. One Question: Who are we going to be?

Fifty years ago, I was eleven years old.

In June of 1976, my family was moving from the towering redwoods of Northern California to the wide-open prairies of South Dakota. My father was a Lutheran pastor, and although we lived in one of the most beautiful places in America, it was also economically depressed. The congregations he served could barely afford his salary. He substitute taught. My mother worked as a nurse for a local doctor in Garberville.

As children, we never knew we were poor.

We lived in Redway among giant redwoods. We built tree forts. We played in moss gardens beneath ancient trees. We had cats, a dog, and a world that felt enchanted. Local hippies occasionally “adopted” our dog without permission, and somehow my father always tracked him down and brought him home.

It was magical.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Magical Redwoods

Then we packed everything we owned into a moving truck and station wagon and headed halfway across the country.

My father and older brother drove the moving van. My mother drove the station wagon with me, my brothers, our cats, and our dog.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Leaving Home

Somewhere along the way, we got separated.

This was 1976.

No cell phones. No GPS. No way to text, “Where are you?”

I remember sleeping in the station wagon in a parking lot in the middle of nowhere. We didn’t know where Dad was. We weren’t entirely sure where we were. Money was tight enough that sleeping in the car made sense. The kittens bounced around inside the vehicle during the night, still searching for the mother cat we had lost somewhere along the journey.

1976 โ†’ 2026 Two Bicentennials. One Question: Who are we going to be?
Lost in the Middle of America

Looking back, I realize how frightening that must have been for my mother.

Yet somehow, with paper maps and determination, she found her way.

We arrived in a tiny South Dakota town just days before the Fourth of Julyโ€”the Bicentennial of the United States.

And suddenly everything changed.

The church members had already gathered. Dad and my brother were unloading the truck. People we had never met were carrying our furniture into a large parsonage with a huge yard, apple trees, a garden, and even playground equipment.

Everyone welcomed us.

Everyone.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Arrival and Welcome

The town was preparing for the biggest Fourth of July celebration anyone could remember. It was America’s 200th birthday.

There was a bicycle parade where children decorated their bikes in red, white, and blue. There were baseball games, tractor pulls, a bazaar, fireworks, and a grease pig contest.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
The Great Fourth of July

I entered the grease pig contest.

At the end, three of us managed to catch the squealing pig. I had my arms around its middle. One boy held the front. Another held the back.

The rules had been clear: whoever held the pig around the middle won.

Then the judge tapped me on the shoulder and told me to stand up.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Greased Pig Contest

The two boys would compete for the pig.

Not me.

I remember being confused more than angry.

Was it because I was a girl?

Was it because I was the new pastor’s daughter?

I never knew.

My father simply told me I had done well and that sometimes it was better to let things go and enjoy the day.

So I did.

The fireworks that night were extraordinary. Out on the prairie, spent fragments drifted back to Earth, and children ran through the darkness searching for them like treasure.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
South Dakota Fireworks

My mother gave me a copy of Little House on the Prairie, and suddenly this new landscape became magical too.

My brothers and I explored everything.

An abandoned schoolhouse.

A one-room jail.

A giant pile of polished marble that had fallen from a train years earlier and become our fort.

South Dakota became home.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
The Healers

The people were kind. They were patriotic in a healthy way. They loved their town, their neighbors, and their country.

Most of all, I remember a feeling that Americans were celebrating something together.

Not as Republicans.

Not as Democrats.

As Americans.

For a child, it felt like the entire nation had gathered around one enormous campfire.

But time has a way of revealing things children cannot yet see.

Three years later, my father was driven out of that church.

Not by most members.

Not even close.

By roughly thirty percent.

A vocal minority became angry because Dad believed God was large enough to work through evolution. They didn’t merely disagree. They fought. They disrupted meetings. They made church politics unbearable.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
The Fracture

Years later I learned far more about those conflicts.

But one event remains burned into memory.

The town butcherโ€”who was also the mayor and one of the leaders opposing my fatherโ€”shot our dog.

Soon afterward, we left.

Dad eventually left parish ministry altogether and became a hospital chaplain.

He wanted to help people.

He no longer wanted to fight religious politics.

For years I’ve thought about that thirty percent.

Not because they represented the majority.

Because they didn’t.

Most people in that town were kind.

Most people simply wanted to live their lives.

Yet a determined minority changed everything.

Today, I find myself thinking about that lesson again. And my father who taught me not to let people who disappoint you steal your capacity for wonder. When the church became consumed by conflict, he chose service. When I was tapped on the shoulder after gripping the pig by the middle, he showed me there was still sweetness in the air and many more wonderful things to see and do. He reminded me to keep living and keep finding wonder in the ordinary even though life feels unfair sometimes.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Who Are We Going To Be?

America Turns 250 | 1976 to 2026

Fifty years later, that lesson may matter more than ever.

America’s 250th birthday arrives in 2026.

And once again, it feels as though a determined minority has seized control of the national conversation.

Many historians, political scientists, and psychologists have observed a recurring reality of human societies: highly motivated minorities often exert influence far beyond their numbers. Most people are busy raising families, paying bills, and living their lives. Extremists organize. They attend meetings. They show up repeatedly. They create pressure. They dominate institutions. Over time, they can steer entire communities. Sometimes entire nations.

The question isn’t why thirty percent can take over.

The question is why seventy percent so often assumes someone else will stop them.

Watching the Apple TV series Dickinson, I was struck by scenes set on the eve of the Civil War. The characters feel the nation splitting apart around them. Emily’s sister asks a haunting question:

“Is this the end of America?”

The line lands differently today than it did when the show aired. The writers were portraying the 1860s, but many viewers recognized something contemporary beneath the costume dramaโ€”a nation struggling to remember what it is.

I don’t believe America is ending.

But I do believe we are living through one of those moments when the future is being contested.

Meanwhile, another reality has been unfolding quietly since the year before that Bicentennial.

A recent analysis drawing on work from the RAND Corporation estimated that if economic growth since 1975 had been distributed similarly to the decades after World War II, tens of trillions of dollars more would have gone to ordinary Americans rather than concentrating at the top. The cumulative transfer has been estimated at roughly $79 trillion.

Think about that.

An entire lifetime.

My lifetime.

Everyday Kindness Matters | 1976 to 2026

I have never known the America my parents expected.

The America where a single income could support a family.

The America where ordinary workers reliably shared in productivity gains.

The America where retirement seemed attainable.

Research consistently shows that inequality has widened dramatically since the mid-1970s.

My daughter’s generation inherited an even steeper climb.

Higher housing costs.

Higher education costs.

Greater economic insecurity.

More concentrated wealth.

Less certainty that hard work alone will provide stability.

That is not because America lacks resources.

It is because political and economic choices determine who benefits from growth.

Fifty years ago, as fireworks exploded over a tiny South Dakota town, America seemed confident about its future.

Today, many Americans feel anxious about theirs.

Yet when I think back to 1976, what stays with me isn’t the fireworks.

It isn’t the parade.

It isn’t even the pig I should have won.

It is the people.

The neighbors carrying furniture into our new house.

The strangers welcoming us.

The sense that community mattered more than ideology.

The understanding that being American meant belonging to one another.

Perhaps that is the lesson hidden between these two anniversaries.

The future is not determined by the loudest thirty percent.

It is determined by what the other seventy percent decides to do.

America has survived civil war, depression, corruption, and division before.

The question facing us at 250 is the same one facing Emily Dickinson’s generation:

Who are we going to be?

And what kind of country are we willing to build together?

Dad

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Dad and Family — 1970s

As I write this, another anniversary approaches.

Eight years ago, around the Fourth of July, I had a persistent feeling that I needed to go see my father. Life was complicated. I was working at a small Lutheran nonprofit run by a leader who demanded loyalty but offered little grace. I was exhausted from standing my ground against behavior I knew was wrong.

I ignored the feeling.

A few weeks later, on July 25, 2018, my father suffered a heart attack.

I rushed to be with him and spent ten precious days at his side. For a brief moment, it looked as though he might recover. Then he was gone.

While I was sitting beside my dying father, the nonprofit’s CEO fired me.

The contrast could not have been sharper.

One life had been spent serving others.

The other seemed consumed by power.

My father had just celebrated fifty-five years in ministry. Not the kind of ministry that makes headlines. The quieter kind. The kind that sits with families in hospital rooms. The kind that listens more than it speaks. The kind that helps people carry grief, fear, and loss.

He spent a lifetime healing people.

Mom

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Dad and Mom — Passport Picture before Heading to Brazil

Last October, I lost my mother too, so this is the first year without her here.

She was a healer too–working as a nurse but also through her capacity to notice patterns and see hidden possibilities others missed.

My father taught me how to care for people.

My mother taught me how to see.

She taught me to notice patterns, connections, and possibilities hidden beneath the surface of ordinary life. When circumstances became difficult, she taught me to use imagination not as an escape from reality but as a way to engage it more fully.

It was my mother who handed me Little House on the Prairie when an eleven-year-old girl arrived frightened and homesick on the South Dakota prairie.

With one book, she transformed a place of loss into a place of adventure.

Looking back, I realize she had been doing that all along.

More Healers

Perhaps that is what America needs most as it approaches its 250th birthday.

Not louder voices.

Not stronger tribes.

Not better slogans.

More healers.

More people willing to care for one another.

More people willing to imagine a future larger than their fears.

Fifty years ago, the nation gathered to celebrate its 200th birthday.

Today, we stand at another crossroads.

The question is not whether America can survive.

The question is what kind of Americans we choose to become.

The future is not determined by the loudest thirty percent.

It is determined by what the other seventy percent decides to do.

1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
Symbolic America — Who Will We Choose to Be?
1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?
1976 โ†’ 2026
Two Bicentennials.
One Question:
Who are we going to be?

In thinking about what archetype shines through in this blog, I have settled on The Cultivator.

The Cultivator is not the Warrior. Not the Hero.

The Cultivator is someone who tends. Someone who prepares soil. Someone who understands seasons. Someone who doesn’t panic when winter comes. Someone who thinks in generations.

These same ideas matter just as much to our inner landscape as they do to the land upon which we live. And the quality of our individual inner landscape matters a great deal in how we treat our exterior landscape and each other.


The Cultivator

Tends the inner garden.

Plants seeds.

Thinks long-term.

Archetypal products linked to blogs will be housed in an emerging collection:

The Human Verse explores the timeless qualities that help us grow into wiser, more compassionate, and more resilient human beings. Inspired by essays, stories, and enduring archetypes, each piece serves as a quiet reminder that who we become is shaped not only by what happens to us, but by the qualities we choose to cultivate within ourselves.

Monuments Against Time: Nero, Hitler, Trump, the Ruins of Consciousness & Now

Monuments Against Time

Meditation on Ruin, Power, and the Architecture of the Human Mind
May 6, 2026

May 6 is a date of memory. In the final days of the Third Reich, the monumental dreams of empire collapsed into smoke, rubble, and silence. It remains a useful date for remembering how rulers who try to immortalize themselves in stone often leave behind only ruinsโ€”and warnings.

Inside the Third Reich -- Albert Speer, Arch of Triumphant

Monuments Against Time: Nero, Hitler, Trump, the Ruins of Consciousness & Now: Inside the Third Reich — Albert Speer, Arch of Triumphant [Hitler inspecting a model]

The Arc of the Deal -- Donald wants a Napolean-liek Arc De Trump -- Indian Times -- Jan 1 2026
Monuments Against Time: Nero, Hitler, Trump, the Ruins of Consciousness & Now: The Arc of the Deal — Donald wants a Napolean-liek Arc De Trump — Indian Times — Jan 1 2026

Reading Inside the Third Reich by Albert Speer, one is struck by how deeply Adolf Hitler believed architecture could defeat time.

Hitler did not merely want to govern Germany. He wanted to monumentalize himself. He dreamed of immense boulevards, colossal halls, triumphal arches, and vast domesโ€”an imperial capital meant to outlive criticism, opposition, and death itself. His architect, Speer, understood this perfectly.

Speer also described a chilling idea he called ruin valueโ€”the belief that buildings should be designed so that, even after centuries of decay, their remains would stand like the ruins of ancient Roman Empire. Hitler admired Rome because its arches, forums, and domes still projected authority long after emperors had vanished into dust. He wanted future ages to look upon the remains of his Reich and imagine permanence.

That dream was already ancient.

Nero too understood architecture as theater of immortality. After the Great Fire of Rome, he began building the vast Domus Aureaโ€”the Golden House. It was a palace of spectacle, extravagance, and imperial self-glorification. But while the golden halls rose, political reality collapsed. His reign ended not in triumph, but in ruin. Nero died by suicide.

Hitler followed a similar arc, though on a scale of destruction the ancient world could scarcely imagine. His grand boulevard, his triumphal arch, his monumental Great Hallโ€”most never rose beyond paper, stone, and fantasy. The empire proclaimed to last a thousand years collapsed in twelve. He too died by suicide as the world he had set ablaze closed around him.

Now, in 2026, we again encounter the old pathology in Donald Trump.

Golden ballrooms. Monumental gestures. Ceremonial architecture. Personal branding made physical. Public grandeur fused with private vanity.

This is not merely taste. It is political psychology.

When rulers become obsessed with monumental architecture, they are often trying to convert inner instability into outward permanence. Stone becomes propaganda. Size becomes legitimacy. Spectacle becomes substitute for moral authority.

Yet there is an irony far greater now than in the ages of Nero or Hitler.

Hitler looked backward toward Rome because Roman monuments had survived centuries. Stone still seemed eternal.

But modern humanity has crossed a threshold neither Rome nor the Third Reich fully understood.

We live in the nuclear age.

In our age, no arch survives certainty. No dome defeats thermonuclear fire. No boulevard outlives planetary self-destruction. Under nuclear blast, the largest ballroom becomes dust as quickly as the smallest home. The fantasy of permanence has become technologically obsolete.

That is the dark absurdity of our time.

The more powerful civilization becomes, the less capable monuments are of saving it.

That is why the deepest struggle of the twenty-first century is not architectural, military, or economic.

It is psychological.

In Sapience: The Moment Is Now, this is the insight embodied by Yong Xing-li.

In that dystopian future, Yong is among the richest men alive. He possesses the wealth to build towers, monuments, pleasure palaces, or entire cities devoted to spectacle. He could entertain himself to death, as so many oligarchs, emperors, and modern billionaire CEOs have done before him.

He does not.

He turns toward something almost invisible.

He devotes himself to understanding consciousness itselfโ€”how human beings perceive, imagine, fear, obey, fragment, and awaken. He understands that unless consciousness evolves, every advance in technology, every accumulation of wealth, every expansion of power only increases humanityโ€™s capacity for self-annihilation.

Yong understands what Nero never grasped, what Hitler could never grasp, and what many of todayโ€™s rulers still do not grasp:

The greatest monument humanity will ever build cannot be made of marble, steel, gold, or stone.

It must be built within the human mind.

Without mastering consciousness, humanity will not merely destroy cities.

It will succeed in destroying its future.

That is the real ruin value of our age.

Not what remains standing after collapseโ€”

but whether enough human beings awaken before collapse arrives.

Hitlers crazy plan for Berlin: The World Capital Germania

Archetypal Animation created by Genolve.

Music: Ruins of Permanence 03:10 Stability (also Genolve): Slow tempo dark ambient with low strings, distant brass, soft choir, piano accents, and deep drones. Sparse percussion, minor harmony, no flashy solos. Mood is solemn, haunted, reflective, then quietly transcendent

Boring Apocalypse: Trapped in a Slow Collapse

Boring Apocalypse: Trapped in a Slow Collapse connects directly to this essay because the collapse of civilizations rarely arrives all at once. Empires often decay graduallyโ€”through normalization, spectacle, distraction, institutional erosion, and collective denial. Monumental architecture can become part of that psychology. Grand projects create the illusion of strength even as deeper systems weaken beneath the surface. What appears permanent in stone may actually be masking a slower political, moral, and civilizational unraveling.



Loyalty Over Truth: From Qin Shi Huang to Trump

This podcast also connects to Loyalty Over Truth: From Qin Shi Huang to Trump in the Wisdom Guardians series. This year, Wisdom Guardians is focused on ruthless rulers throughout human historyโ€”a critical thread in Sapience: The Moment Is Now. In the novel, Yong Xing-li, aided by four human-like intelligence AIs, undertakes a deep exploration of how ruthless rulers shaped human consciousness across civilizations. Raโ€”one of Yongโ€™s AIsโ€”guides him through the Hall of Ruthless Rulers. Qin Shi Huang is among the first figures encountered on that journey, and I am currently working on Nero.

Because of narrative space, only one ruthless ruler could be fully embedded in Sapience itself: Herod the Great. Wisdom Guardians allows me to explore the rulers that could not fit inside the novel. Understanding how these figures manipulated fear, loyalty, myth, memory, spectacle, and obedience is essential because that historical knowledge becomes part of the larger project of transforming human consciousness.


Sapience: The Moment Is Now (Kindle)

The link to Sapience: The Moment Is Now matters because that is where readers encounter Yong Xing-li more fullyโ€”who he is, what he is trying to do, and why. In a future shaped by ecological stress, political fracture, technological acceleration, and the recurring psychology of ruthless rulers, Yong understands that humanityโ€™s greatest danger is not merely external conflict but untransformed consciousness itself.

His work is therefore not to build monuments, accumulate spectacle, or consolidate power. It is to understand how consciousness can evolve on a scale never before achieved. Yong knows that unless human beings learn to master fear, projection, domination, and self-deception, humanity may ultimately succeed in doing what no empire before it could fully do: kill itself off on Earth.


The Epstein Survivor Hoodie belongs here because this essay is ultimately about what happens when power begins to believe it is exempt from accountability. Across history, ruthless rulers often surround themselves with systems of privilege, loyalty, and protection that encourage the belief that wealth, status, and proximity to power place them above ordinary moral limits. That same psychology does not remain confined to architecture or political spectacleโ€”it can spread into institutions, social norms, and cultures of impunity.

The hoodie therefore serves as more than apparel. It is a reminder that societies are judged not by the grandeur of their monuments but by whether they protect the vulnerable, tell the truth about abuse, and hold the powerful accountable. That question sits at the center of this essay: whether human beings will continue repeating old patterns of domination, or whether consciousness can evolve enough to break them.

Part of the Inconvenient Women Collection at The Quip Collection (Etsy and Sapience shops).